Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 13, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@suejung-sentry
Copy link
Contributor

@suejung-sentry suejung-sentry commented Jan 9, 2025

Follows up to #910 which added restrictions to Enterprise "guest_access: off" behavior.

This PR adds in a fix to account for when a user owner does not have any plan_activated_users. From what I could tell from our current data model this is not possible, but I think historic data ends up with this case which caused the reported issue by customer, so fixed with this PR.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests were found.

📣 Thoughts on this report? Let Codecov know! | Powered by Codecov

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.02%. Comparing base (8660eab) to head (4220430).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1088   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.02%   96.02%           
=======================================
  Files         828      828           
  Lines       19485    19486    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        18710    18711    +1     
  Misses        775      775           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 92.31% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unit-latest-uploader 92.31% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@codecov-notifications
Copy link

codecov-notifications bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@suejung-sentry suejung-sentry marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2025 22:39
@suejung-sentry suejung-sentry requested a review from a team as a code owner January 9, 2025 22:39
@suejung-sentry suejung-sentry added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit a0c8267 Jan 10, 2025
19 checks passed
@suejung-sentry suejung-sentry deleted the sshin/fix/1859-2 branch January 10, 2025 18:10
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants